Evangelism By Legal Ruling?

This Hobby Lobby issue now before the Supreme Court fascinates me.

As I understand it, the owners of Hobby Lobby do not want to be in a position where they are required to provide, through the Affordable Care Act, certain forms of contraception. Interesting. Does this not indicate that their belief is that Christians should not utilize those forms of contraception? And if their corporation is a Christian body, then, would not the various employees be members of that body? And if they are members of that body wouldn’t it be true that they would never use the objected to form of contraception? And if, the above is true, what’s the point of the suit.

Or, is Hobby Lobby attempting to use the United States Supreme Court as an evangelical tool?

Just wondering.

 

Comments

[parodie]

This seems like an interesting argument which I would find sympathetic, but I just can't parse it. Somewhere in these two questions, I get lost: "Does this not indicate that their belief is that Christians should not utilize those forms of contraception? And if their corporation is a Christian body, then, would not the various employees be members of that body? "

[Larry Greeson]

I may be wrong but are they arguing contraception or post conception drugs?