Let’s get the disclaimers out of the way before I begin this
writing:
First, I’m a William Willimon groupie. It’s kind of strange
to say that since I’m a good bit older than this United Methodist Bishop with the prolific pen
and penetrating mind. Nevertheless, since hearing him preach while he was Dean
of the Duke University Chapel, I’ve read many, if not most, of his writings and
have followed his career with interest. (Granted the last six years I’ve been
following him to derive the answer to the question: Why would anyone give up
being Dean of the Chapel at Duke University to become a bishop?)
Second, I am about to take issue with Bishop Willimon’s
assessment of what makes an effective pastor. But, according to Bishop Willimon’s
calculations, I am an effective pastor. This will be explained below.
Now, with the above being said, let me respond to a United
Methodist News Service Commentary by Bishop William Willimon titled “Effective
Clergy By the Numbers.”
In his opening two paragraphs, the Bishop states:
How do
we Methodists define effective clergy?
We do it with one word: growth. Effective clergy
know how
to grow the church in its membership,
witness and mission.
In North
Alabama, we now have a “Conference
Dashboard” that every church logs in Monday
morning and reports
its numbers for that Sunday’s
attendance, baptisms, professions of faith,
offering
and participation in mission.
Let’s give it up for the Bishop as regards the latter part
of that statement. The North Alabama churches report their participation in
mission (I assume for the preceding week.). That’s definitely a step in the
right direction. I’ve been filling out United Methodist Annual Conference
reports for four decades and so far the only thing I’ve been asked is how much
and how many (The other parts of the North Alabama Conference reports). Here
lies my bone of contention:
The Bishop, after giving a nod of the head toward a church’s
involvement in mission, then uses his entire commentary to make his case for
judging on numbers based on Wesleyan tradition. The Bishop says, “The push back
we have received in this endeavor (judging clergy effectiveness by counting how
many) has surprised me. In nearly every group of clergy in which I’ve discussed
our work, there is always someone to repeat at least one of these mindless
mantras. ‘It’s all about numbers, is it?’ ‘You can’t measure clergy
effectiveness, can you?’ ‘So it’s come to this: putting the butts in the pews.’
Yada, yada, yada.”
With all due respect, Bishop, at this point in your
commentary you have, I fear, denigrated the work of the little country church
for which I have been privileged to serve as a retired supply pastor for the
last six years. That, unintended relegation of my congregation to an
unimportant status, results from the fact that, as noted above, once you gave a
passing nod to “participation in mission” your commentary chronicles the
history of “counting how many” as a true Wesleyan tradition and in the course
of that you relate several incidents in which this is historically true. I
note, however, in passing, that all of your references come from the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries, a time of tremendous church growth in the Western
world, and you make no allowance for the complexities of growing a church in a
world where the church’s reputation and influence is not nineteenth century, or
even twentieth century, for that matter.
Here’s the crux of the matter, Bishop:
By your contentions, I am an effective pastor. This little
congregation has grown in the past six year. This current year would no doubt
bring a “high five” from you as the percentage of growth is significant with
the majority of them being by profession of faith. Dizzy Dean said, Bishop, “If
it’s true it ain’t bragging.” So, it ain’t bragging when I say the percentage
of growth here in this little valley is going to make some other pastors look,
by your judgment, really, really ineffective.
My problem with your thesis, Bishop, is that these numbers
don’t matter in the overall scheme of here in our little corner of the world.
What matters is this: This church provides some really impressive ministries. Most
of the ministries our church does on its own, but sometimes we partner with that
big and rich First Church down the road, but always on a fifty-fifty basis.
Every year when
school starts every child in this county, certified as “in need” by the school
system family advocates, receives a new book bag. The book bag is filled with
enough grade appropriate school supplies for the first semester. The bag also
contains new clothes selected specifically for that child. {Picture, if you
will, Bishop, an eight-year-old girl standing on the front porch of the church
and exclaiming with tears in her eyes, “Oh, look, Mommy, these are new!”] Each
of those children also get checked for and treated, when necessary, for lice.
And they get a free trip to the barber or the hair salon.
Every New Year’s Day this little church provides a meal of
turnip greens and black-eyed peas and cornbread and lots of fellowship for any
who want to come, but particularly the senior citizens of the community. Have
you ever considered that New Years Day is a lonely holiday for many. The family
doesn’t come; there are no presents. There’s just an empty house. But that’s
not true in this community because of this little ministry.
This congregation, when the school board cut funding,
stepped in and provided needed supplies for the school nurse at the school with
the county’s most impoverished pupils. This congregation also provides all the
family advocates of the school system with undies to be distributed to
elementary students who need such.
Up above I mentioned we cooperated on that “Back-to-School
Project” on a fifty-fifty basis with that big old First Church. We also
cooperate with them to provide for two transitional houses for women with
children in this county. This support includes the costs of social workers and
other needed services from the homeless arm of the conference.
The congregation recently brought high speed internet
service into the church in preparation for the Internet Café that will be in
place when school begins next August . Turns out there are a significant number
of children in the schools a mile up the road from us who have no internet
access at home. Now they can do their school work needing internet access at the church. Additionally, adults can apply for jobs online.
And then there’s the Soup Supper Monday, every Monday for
the last three years. It started to provide a free meal for the many, many
unemployed folks in this county when the economy was so bad. Now it includes
the youth of the church delivering more meals to homebound and sick people than
we serve at the church.
Have I mentioned this little congregation of 120 on the
books, but about 80 in fact, is the largest single financial supporter of the
work of a missionary in Peru?
The point is, Bishop, each of these ministries (and those listed here are not all) that touch
the lives of so many of God’s needful children are tremendously more important
than the numbers I report. You see, Bishop, the growth that’s started in this
little congregation is not the result of me being effective. I am effective,
Bishop, because these people are in mission, are putting others before
themselves, are seeking to serve Christ in the corner of the world where they
have been planted.
It’s a struggle, Bishop. This is a poor county. These are
not rich people. We have a lot of yard sales and a whole lot of bean suppers.
But the Lord provides a way. (If you’re interested I can sell you a $5 raffle ticket
for $250 in free food at a really fancy restaurant up the road.) I have a feeling the Lord’s provided the means
because this congregation didn’t wait until they got an “effective pastor” to
add numbers. They just started being in mission. That’s what made their pastor
effective. It’s not about me, Bishop. It’s about a church that has an open
door, an open heart, and an open mind.
I do understand the point of your commentary, Bishop
Willimon. But I think sometimes we get the emphasis on the wrong syl-LAB-le
Okay, Bishop Willimon, you’re still my hero, and when your
next book comes out I’ll most likely read it, if I have enough time while
serving this church. You know, you might think about this as a theme for a book: The
mission statement of our church is: “The mission of the Church is to make
disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.” Maybe the best
way to “effectively” carry out that mission is: “To be a disciple of Jesus
Christ.”
Recent Comments